Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10102634›Full record

ArticleOncogene1999

Refinement of the LOH region 1 at 11q23.1 deleted in human breast carcinomas and sublocalization of 11 expressed sequence tags within the refined region.

M G di Iasio, G Calin, M G Tibiletti, I Vorechovsky, K P Benediktsson, R Taramelli, G Barbanti-Brodano, M Negrini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Human microRNA genes are frequently located at fragile sites and genomic regions involved in cancers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2004
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

M G di IasioDepartment of Molecular and Diagnostic Medicine, University of Ferrara, Italy.
G Calin
M G Tibiletti
I Vorechovsky
K P Benediktsson
R Taramelli
G Barbanti-Brodano
M Negrini
University of Ferrara · ITIntegrated Cardio Metabolic Centre · SEKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loss of constitutive heterozygosity at 11q23 has been detected in various human solid tumors. Here, we described the analysis of a series of normal and tumor pairs from 110 breast carcinomas for the presence of loss of heterozygosity at 11q23 loci. The overall frequency of LOH was 48%, confirming the importance of deletions at 11q23 in breast tumorigenesis. Previously, we have identified two independent regions of LOH at 11q23, the LOH region 1 at 11q23.1 and the LOH region 2 at 11q23.3. The most telomeric region was recently refined between loci D11S1345 and D11S1316, a region of about 1 Mb. However, the LOH region 1, most centromeric, was still not finely refined: the boundaries were defined by loci D11S2000 and D11S897, separated by about 8 Mb. Here, we refined its boundaries between loci D11S1347 and D11S927, a region of about 2 Mb. We have mapped 11 expressed sequence tags (ESTs) within this region and excluded another 20. This study represents a further step toward the identification of the putative tumor suppressor gene found within the LOH region 1 at 11q23.1.

Indexed as

Sequence DeletionBreast NeoplasmsCarcinomaChromosome MappingChromosomes, Human, Pair 11DNA, NeoplasmExpressed Sequence TagsFemaleHumansLoss of HeterozygosityDNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID10102634
OpenAlexW2321007082

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
measurements read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.