Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10101177›Full record

ArticleGenetics1999

Suppression of intrachromosomal gene conversion in mammalian cells by small degrees of sequence divergence.

T Lukacsovich, A S Waldman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T LukacsovichDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA.
A S Waldman
University of South Carolina · US

Funding

NIGMS NIH HHS GM47110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pairs of closely linked defective herpes simplex virus (HSV) thymidine kinase (tk) gene sequences exhibiting various nucleotide heterologies were introduced into the genome of mouse Ltk- cells. Recombination events were recovered by selecting for the correction of a 16-bp insertion mutation in one of the tk sequences. We had previously shown that when two tk sequences shared a region of 232 bp of homology, interruption of the homology by two single nucleotide heterologies placed 19 bp apart reduced recombination nearly 20-fold. We now report that either one of the nucleotide heterologies alone reduces recombination only about 2.5-fold, indicating that the original pair of single nucleotide heterologies acted synergistically to inhibit recombination. We tested a variety of pairs of single nucleotide heterologies and determined that they reduced recombination from 7- to 175-fold. Substrates potentially leading to G-G or C-C mispairs in presumptive heteroduplex DNA (hDNA) intermediates displayed a particularly low rate of recombination. Additional experiments suggested that increased sequence divergence causes a shortening of gene conversion tracts. Collectively, our results suggest that suppression of recombination between diverged sequences is mediated via processing of a mispaired hDNA intermediate.

Indexed as

Gene ConversionAnimalsBase SequenceDNADNA PrimersGenes, ViralL CellsMiceMutagenesis, InsertionalNucleic Acid HeteroduplexesSimplexvirusThymidine KinaseDNADNA PrimersNucleic Acid HeteroduplexesThymidine Kinase

Identifiers

PMID10101177
PMCPMC1460558
OpenAlexW2183895450

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.