Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10097119›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1999

Genomic evolution during a 10,000-generation experiment with bacteria.

D Papadopoulos, D Schneider, J Meier-Eiss, W Arber, R E Lenski, M Blot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The complex genomic diversity ofEcology and evolution · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Molecular Characterization ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Evolutionary Rescue of an EnvironmentalFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Insertion element mediatedInfection and drug resistance · 2018
    Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

D PapadopoulosAbteilung Mikrobiologie, Biozentrum, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
D Schneider
J Meier-Eiss
W Arber
R E Lenski
M Blot

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular methods are used widely to measure genetic diversity within populations and determine relationships among species. However, it is difficult to observe genomic evolution in action because these dynamics are too slow in most organisms. To overcome this limitation, we sampled genomes from populations of Escherichia coli evolving in the laboratory for 10,000 generations. We analyzed the genomes for restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) using seven insertion sequences (IS) as probes; most polymorphisms detected by this approach reflect rearrangements (including transpositions) rather than point mutations. The evolving genomes became increasingly different from their ancestor over time. Moreover, tremendous diversity accumulated within each population, such that almost every individual had a different genetic fingerprint after 10,000 generations. As has been often suggested, but not previously shown by experiment, the rates of phenotypic and genomic change were discordant, both across replicate populations and over time within a population. Certain pivotal mutations were shared by all descendants in a population, and these are candidates for beneficial mutations, which are rare and difficult to find. More generally, these data show that the genome is highly dynamic even over a time scale that is, from an evolutionary perspective, very brief.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenome, BacterialPhylogenyCell DivisionEscherichia coliModels, GeneticTime

Identifiers

PMID10097119
PMCPMC22376

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.