Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10091943›Full record

ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis1998

Use of tumor lines with selectable markers in assessing the effect on experimental metastases of combination chemotherapy with alkylating agents.

B E Miller, L Delmonico, K Vistisen, F R Miller

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

B E MillerBreast Cancer Program, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
L Delmonico
K Vistisen
F R Miller

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-dose chemotherapy with a 3-day regimen of cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and carmustine was used to treat mice bearing experimental lung metastases of mammary tumor cell lines with selectable markers (lines 66cl4 and 4TO7). Cloning of lung cells at various times after treatment revealed a rapid 3 to 4 log loss of clonogenic tumor cells, down to undetectable levels. However, after several weeks, clonogenic tumor cells reappeared in the lungs; few cures were obtained even when mice had a relatively low tumor burden when treated with chemotherapy. Splenocyte numbers and response to Concanavalin A indicated a transient immunosuppression. In one experiment, mice were treated with a second round of chemotherapy 3 weeks after the first. The number of clonogenic cells per lung again dropped, but regrowth of cells was rapid, and no cures were obtained. Inoculation of tumor-bearing mice s.c. after chemotherapy with lethally irradiated cells of the highly immunogenic tumor cell line 4TO7-IL-2 had little effect on the rate of reappearance of line 4TO7 in lungs, but subsequent growth of tumor cells in lungs was slowed. This model system can be used to test the efficacy of additional immunotherapy and chemotherapy regimens on minimal residual metastatic disease after high-dose chemotherapy, when remaining metastatic cells are apparently dormant.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarmustineCisplatinCyclophosphamideDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorImmunotherapyMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C3HNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasms, ExperimentalTumor Cells, CulturedAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingCarmustineCisplatinCyclophosphamide

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.