Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10091273›Full record

ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)1999

Exercise metabolism and beta-blocker therapy. An update.

A Head

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

A HeadDepartment of Sport Sciences, Brunel University, Isleworth, England.
Brunel University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rationale for the concurrent prescription of beta-blockers and programmes of exercise is that both medication and physical activity can improve the quality of life of patients with cardiovascular disease. Difficulties arise when drugs reduce either the physical ability or the motivation to exercise. This article focuses on the physiological limitations to prolonged aerobic exercise in patients receiving beta-blockers. Possible limiting factors to exercise while taking beta-blockers include reduction in heart rate and cardiac output, local alterations to blood flow, changes to muscle and liver glycogenolysis, and alterations to adipose and intra-muscular lipolysis. The disadvantages and advantages of nonselective and beta 1-selective drugs are discussed, as well as those of drugs that have beta 2-agonist properties. Particular emphasis is placed upon the beta-blocker-induced attenuation of the normal increase in fat oxidation during prolonged exercise. There are physiological advantages, especially for the physically active individual, in prescribing beta 1-selective rather than nonselective drugs in controlled release, rather than conventional release, form. Additionally, there may be further advantages in prescribing drugs which have partial agonist properties at beta 2 receptors.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueAdrenergic beta-AgonistsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsCardiac OutputCardiovascular DiseasesDelayed-Action PreparationsExerciseGlycogenHeart RateHumansLipid MetabolismLiverMetabolismMuscle, SkeletalQuality of LifeAdrenergic beta-AgonistsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsDelayed-Action PreparationsGlycogen

Identifiers

PMID10091273
OpenAlexW2062214269

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.