Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10085292›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology1999

Dissection of cell division processes in the one cell stage Caenorhabditis elegans embryo by mutational analysis.

P Gönczy, H Schnabel, T Kaletta, A D Amores, T Hyman, R Schnabel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 173 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ultrastructure Expansion Microscopy applied tomicroPublication biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Mechanistic insights into central spindle assembly mediated by the centralspindlin complex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Mitotic Cell Division inGenetics · 2019
    Review

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P GönczyEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany. gonczy@EMBL-Heidelberg.de
H Schnabel
T Kaletta
A D Amores
T Hyman
R Schnabel
European Molecular Biology Laboratory · DEMax Planck Institut für Zellbiologie · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To identify novel components required for cell division processes in complex eukaryotes, we have undertaken an extensive mutational analysis in the one cell stage Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. The large size and optical properties of this cell permit observation of cell division processes with great detail in live specimens by simple differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy. We have screened an extensive collection of maternal-effect embryonic lethal mutations on chromosome III with time-lapse DIC video microscopy. Using this assay, we have identified 48 mutations in 34 loci which are required for specific cell division processes in the one cell stage embryo. We show that mutations fall into distinct phenotypic classes which correspond, among others, to the processes of pronuclear migration, rotation of centrosomes and associated pronuclei, spindle assembly, chromosome segregation, anaphase spindle positioning, and cytokinesis. We have further analyzed pronuclear migration mutants by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy using antibodies against tubulin and ZYG-9, a centrosomal marker. This analysis revealed that two pronuclear migration loci are required for generating normal microtubule arrays and four for centrosome separation. All 34 loci have been mapped by deficiencies to distinct regions of chromosome III, thus paving the way for their rapid molecular characterization. Our work contributes to establishing the one cell stage C. elegans embryo as a powerful metazoan model system for dissecting cell division processes.

Indexed as

Cell DivisionMutationAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansChromosome MappingEmbryo, NonmammalianFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectMicroscopy, FluorescenceModels, Biological

Identifiers

PMID10085292
PMCPMC2148205
OpenAlexW2012809099

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.