ReviewDrugs & aging1999
Molecular chemotherapy for breast cancer.
Review in Drugs & aging, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the role and diversity of mucins in health and disease with special insight into non-communicable diseases.Glycoconjugate journal · 2015Review
- Protection of CHO cells by transfer of survivin driven by ovarian-specific promoter OSP-2.Molecular biology reports · 2011Article
- Transcriptional Targeting in Cancer Gene Therapy.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2003Article
- The telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter drives efficacious tumor suicide gene therapy while preventing hepatotoxicity encountered with constitutive promoters.Gene therapy · 2001Article
- Recent advances in imaging endogenous or transferred gene expression utilizing radionuclide technologies in living subjects: applications to breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2001Review
- Potential applications of gene therapy in the patient with cancer.Drugs & aging · 2000Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene therapy for breast cancer initially involves local or systemic delivery. Local delivery may be intrapleural or via direct injection to lesions. However, systemic delivery remains the greatest challenge with targeting, although methods using antibodies or growth factor receptor ligands have been demonstrated in preclinical models. This review focuses on the next step of using tissue-specific promoters such as Muc-1, CEA, PSA, HER-2, Myc, L-plastin and secretory leukoproteinase inhibitor promoters. All of these have demonstrated differential upregulation in breast cancer and additional specificity may be obtained by using physiological stimuli that are more frequently expressed in cancers, such as glucose regulated promoters and hypoxia response elements or radiation inducible elements. Amongst the later are the EGR-1, p21 and tissue type plaminogen activator promoters. Potential therapy genes include the prodrug activation system 5-fluorocytosine and other analogues of antimetabolites, but all of these need gap junctions to transfer the phosphorylated metabolites. Other approaches involving more freely diffusible products include cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide and thymidine phosphorylase to activate 5-deoxy-5-fluoruridine to fluorouracil. The bystander effect is important both for cell killing and for immunological and antivascular effects. Breast cancer is one type of tumour where a major clinical research effort is underway using local delivery methods. For prodrug activation systems, the use of human enzymes is desirable to prevent an immunological response that would eventually eliminate cells producing the prodrug activation system. The use of alkylating agents has an advantage over antimetabolites in that they are cytotoxic to cycling and noncycling cells, and the cytotoxic products can diffuse across cell membranes without the need for gap junctions. They also have a much steeper dose response curve than antimetabolites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.