Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10082705›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1999

A model for clinical governance in primary care groups.

R Baker, M Lakhani, R Fraser, F Cheater

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The role of clinical governance as a strategy for quality improvement in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Article
  7. Clinical governance in Scotland: an educational model.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Article
  8. Clinical governance and pathology.Journal of clinical pathology · 2002
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Corporate moral responsibility in health care.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2000
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Managing chronic disease.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R BakerEli Lilly National Clinical Audit Centre, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW. rb14@le.ac.uk
M Lakhani
R Fraser
F Cheater

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareFamily PracticeHealth PrioritiesProfessional PracticeState MedicineUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID10082705
PMCPMC1115216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.