ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1999
Unified budgets for primary care groups.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Approach to economic evaluation in primary care: review of a useful tool for primary care reform.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2013Review
- Pharmaceutical cost control in primary care: opinion and contributions by healthcare professionals.BMC health services research · 2009Article
- A model based on age, sex, and morbidity to explain variation in UK general practice prescribing: cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2008Article
- ASSET (Age/Sex Standardised Estimates of Treatment): a research model to improve the governance of prescribing funds in Italy.PloS one · 2007Article
- Are New Zealand's new primary health organisations fit for purpose?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Article
- General practice and the New Zealand health reforms--lessons for Australia?Australia and New Zealand health policy · 2005Article
- Primary care in the United States: primary care gatekeeping and referrals: effective filter or failed experiment?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003Article
- Tackling organisational change in the new NHS.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001Article
- Will primary care trusts lead to US-style health care?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001Article
- Cross sectional study of primary care groups in London: association of measures of socioeconomic and health status with hospital admission rates.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000Article
- New formula for GP prescribing budgets. General practitioners in England need to understand its implications.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000Article
- New Zealand's independent practitioner associations: a working model of clinical governance in primary care?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999Review
- Reforming British primary care (again)BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.