Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10077531›Full record

ArticleGenome research1999

Analysis of 148 kb of genomic DNA around the wnt1 locus of Fugu rubripes.

K Gellner, S Brenner

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Analysis of the wnt1 regulatory chromosomal landscape.Development genes and evolution · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mapping of complex regulatory elements by pufferfish/zebrafish transgenesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2001
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

K GellnerMolecular Sciences Institute, Berkeley, California 94704 USA. kgellner@pan.zoo.uni.jena.de
S Brenner
Molecular Sciences Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of the sequence of approximately 150 kb of a genomic region corresponding to the wnt1 gene of the Japanese pufferfish Fugu rubripes confirms the compact structure of the genome. Fifteen genes were found in this region, and 26.6% of the analyzed sequence is coding sequence. With an average intergenic distance of <5 kb, this gene density is comparable to that of Caenorhabditis elegans. The compactness of this region corresponds to the reduction of the overall size of the genome, consistent with the conclusion that the gene number in Fugu and human genomes is approximately the same. Eight of the genes have been mapped in the human genome and all of them are found in the chromosomal band 12q13, indicating a high degree of synteny in both species, Fugu and human. Comparative sequence analysis allows us to identify potential regulatory elements for wnt1 and ARF3, which are common to fish and mammals.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Proteins3' Untranslated Regions5' Untranslated RegionsAnimalsBase SequenceChromosome MappingDNADNA-Binding ProteinsFishes, PoisonousHumansMolecular Sequence DataNucleic Acid HybridizationSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNASequence Homology, Nucleic AcidZinc Fingers3' Untranslated Regions5' Untranslated RegionsDNADNA-Binding ProteinsKMT2D protein, humanNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID10077531
PMCPMC310722
OpenAlexW1809977585

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
measurements read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.