Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10074125›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology1999

A second-site mutation that restores replication of a Tat-defective human immunodeficiency virus.

K Verhoef, B Berkhout

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Cure and Long-Term Remission Strategies.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. HIV-1 evolution: frustrating therapies, but disclosing molecular mechanisms.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2010
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K VerhoefDepartment of Human Retrovirology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
B Berkhout
Academic Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously constructed a large set of mutants of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) regulatory protein Tat with conservative amino acid substitutions in the activation domain. These Tat variants were analyzed in the context of the infectious virus, and several mutants were found to be defective for replication. In an attempt to obtain second-site suppressor mutations that could provide information on the Tat protein structure, some of the replication-impaired viruses were used as a parent for the isolation of revertant viruses with improved replication capacity. Sequence analysis of revertant viruses frequently revealed changes within the tat gene, most often first-site reversions either to the wild-type amino acid or to related amino acids that restore, at least partially, the Tat function and virus replication. Of 30 revertant cultures, we identified only one second-site suppressor mutation. The inactive Y26A mutant yielded the second-site suppressor mutation Y47N that partially restored trans-activation activity and virus replication. Surprisingly, when the suppressor mutation was introduced in the wild-type Tat background, it also improved the trans-activation function of this protein about twofold. We conclude that the gain of function measured for the Y47N change is not specific for the Y26A mutant, arguing against a direct interaction of Tat amino acids 26 and 47 in the three-dimensional fold of this protein. Other revertant viruses did not contain any additional Tat changes, and some viruses revealed putative second-site Tat mutations that did not significantly improve Tat function and virus replication. We reason that these mutations were introduced by chance through founder effects or by linkage to suppressor mutations elsewhere in the virus genome. In conclusion, the forced evolution of mutant HIV-1 genomes, which is an efficient approach for the analysis of RNA regulatory motifs, seems less suited for the analysis of the structure of this small transcription factor, although protein variants with interesting properties can be generated.

Indexed as

Cells, CulturedGene Expression Regulation, ViralGene Products, tatGenome, ViralHIV-1HumansMutationtat Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency VirusTranscriptional ActivationVirus ReplicationGene Products, tattat Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Identifiers

PMID10074125
PMCPMC104035
OpenAlexW1600261915

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.