Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10073743›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology1999

Vasoconstriction in human isolated middle meningeal arteries: determining the contribution of 5-HT1B- and 5-HT1F-receptor activation.

Z Razzaque, M A Heald, J D Pickard, L Maskell, M S Beer, R G Hill, J Longmore

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Inhaled 5-HTComprehensive Physiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. The 5-HTNature reviews. Neurology · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. New Approaches to Shifting the Migraine Treatment Paradigm.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Functional Characterization of 5-HTThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Distribution of 5-HTFrontiers in neurology · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. 5-HT(1F) Receptor agonists: a new treatment option for migraine attacks?Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2010
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Post-triptan era for the treatment of acute migraine.Current pain and headache reports · 2004
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Z RazzaqueMerck Sharp & Dohme Research Laboratories, Neuroscience Research Centre, Harlow, Essex.
M A Heald
J D Pickard
L Maskell
M S Beer
R G Hill
J Longmore
Addenbrooke's Hospital · GBMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · US

Funding

Medical Research Council G9439390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsSumatriptan is a 5-HT1B/1D-receptor agonist which also has affinity for 5-HT1F-receptors. The vasoconstrictor effects of sumatriptan are thought to be 5-HT1B-receptor mediated and these receptors have been shown to be expressed in human cranial blood vessels. However, in the same tissue mRNA coding for 5-HT1F-receptors has also been identified and this study addresses the possibility of whether 5-HT1F-receptor activation contributes to vasoconstriction.

methodsThe ability of two selective 5-HT1B/1D-receptor antagonists (GR125,743 and GR127,935) with no affinity for 5-HT1F-receptors, to inhibit sumatriptan evoked contractions in human isolated middle meningeal artery was investigated. Using a series of 5-HT1B/1D-receptor agonists (sumatriptan, zolmitriptan, CP122,288, L-741,519 and L-741,604), some with high affinity for 5-HTIF-receptors and the non-selective 5-HT-receptor agonists 5-HT and 5-CT, we compared the vasoconstrictor potency of these drugs in human isolated middle meningeal artery with their affinities at cloned human 5-HT1B-, 5-HT1D-and 5-HT1F-receptors expressed in CHO cell lines.

resultsGR125,743 antagonized sumatriptan evoked contractions in a competitive manner (apparent pA2 9.1) and GR127,935 antagonized sumatriptan-induced responses in a non-competitive manner (reducing the maximum contraction to 27%). There was a significant correlation between vasoconstrictor potency and 5-HT1B-receptor affinity (r=0.93, P=0.002) but not with 5-HT1D- or 5-HT1F-receptor affinity (r=0.74, P=0.06; r= 0.31, P= 0.49, respectively).

conclusionsThese experiments show that in human middle meningeal artery vasoconstriction to sumatriptan-like agents is 5-HT1B-receptor mediated with little if any contribution from 5-HT1F-receptor activation.

Indexed as

AnimalsBenzamidesBinding, CompetitiveCell LineCHO CellsCloning, MolecularCricetinaeHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMeningeal ArteriesOxadiazolesPiperazinesPyridinesReceptors, SerotoninRNA, MessengerSerotonin AntagonistsBenzamidesGR 127935N-(4-methoxy-3-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)phenyl)-3-methyl-4-(4-pyridyl)benzamideOxadiazolesPiperazinesPyridinesReceptors, SerotoninRNA, MessengerSerotonin AntagonistsSerotonin Receptor AgonistsSumatriptan

Identifiers

PMID10073743
PMCPMC2014192
OpenAlexW2121254395

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
measurements read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.