Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10071406›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners1998

General practitioners' continuing education: a review of policies, strategies and effectiveness, and their implications for the future.

F Smith, A Singleton, S Hilton

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Shared decision making and risk communication in practice: a qualitative study of GPs' experiences.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2005
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A continuous curriculum for general practice? Proposals for undergraduate-postgraduate collaboration.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2001
    Article
  8. From CME to CPD: getting better at getting better?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

F SmithDivision of General Practice and Primary Care, St George's Hospital Medical School, London.
A Singleton
S Hilton

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe accreditation and provision of continuing education for general practitioners (GPs) is set to change with new proposals from the General Medical Council, the Government, and the Chief Medical Officer.

aimTo review the theories, policies, strategies, and effectiveness in GP continuing education in the past 10 years.

methodA systematic review of the literature by computerized and manual searches of relevant journals and books.

resultsEducational theory suggests that continuing education (CE) should be work-based and use the learner's experiences. Audit can play an important role in determining performance and needs assessment, but at present is largely a separate activity. Educational and professional support, such as through mentors or co-tutors, has been successfully piloted but awaits larger scale evaluation. Most accredited educational events are still the postgraduate centre lecture, and GP Tutors have a variable role in CE management and provision. Controlled trials of CE strategies suggest effectiveness is enhanced by personal feedback and work prompts. Qualitative studies have demonstrated that education plays only a small part in influencing doctors' behavior.

conclusionMaintaining good clinical practice is on many stakeholders' agendas. A variety of methods may be effective in CE, and larger scale trials or evaluations are needed.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, ContinuingFamily PracticeHumansOrganizational PolicyProgram EvaluationResearch Support as Topic

Identifiers

PMID10071406
PMCPMC1313248

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.