Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10066666›Full record

ArticleClinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology1999

Performance of competitive and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, gel immunoprecipitation with native hapten polysaccharide, and standard serological tests in diagnosis of sheep brucellosis.

C M Marín, E Moreno, I Moriyón, R Díaz, J M Blasco

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bayesian estimation of the seroprevalence of brucellosis in humans and livestock in Kyrgyzstan.Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics) · 2013
    Article
  9. Progress inFrontiers in biology · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Serological diagnosis of Brucella infections in odontocetes.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2009
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

C M MarínUnidad de Sanidad Animal, Servicio de Investigación Agraria, Diputación General de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain.
E Moreno
I Moriyón
R Díaz
J M Blasco
Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón · ESUniversidad de Navarra · ESUniversidad Nacional · CR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Competitive and standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), rose bengal (RB), complement fixation, and agar gel immunoprecipitation with native hapten (AGID-NH) were compared by using sera from Brucella-free, Brucella melitensis-infected, and B. melitensis Rev1-vaccinated sheep. The most sensitive tests were indirect ELISA and RB, and the most specific tests were AGID-NH and competitive ELISA. We show that RB followed by AGID-NH is a simple and effective system for diagnosing sheep brucellosis.

Indexed as

Brucella melitensisAnimalsAntigens, BacterialBinding, CompetitiveBrucellosisEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayGelsHaptensPrecipitin TestsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySerologic TestsSheepSheep DiseasesAntigens, BacterialGelsHaptens

Identifiers

PMID10066666
PMCPMC95699
OpenAlexW1869678763

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.