Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10066215›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1999

Legal and political considerations of clinical practice guidelines.

B Hurwitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A systematic review of standard treatment guidelines in India.The Indian journal of medical research · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Guidelines are merely guidelines.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  7. From BPH to male LUTS: a 20-year journey of the EAU guidelines.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Public variant databases: liability?Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2017
    Article
  11. Improving precision medicine using individual patient data from trials.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinical guidance: Guidance on guidance.British dental journal · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Clinical guidelines in Hematology.Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

B HurwitzDepartment of Primary Care and General Practice, Imperial College School of Medicine, St Mary's Campus, London W2 1PG. b.hurwitz@ic.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicClinical MedicineJurisprudenceLiability, LegalQuality of Health CareState MedicineUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID10066215
PMCPMC1115098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.