Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10049045›Full record

ArticleLeukemia1999

Primers and protocols for standardized detection of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia using immunoglobulin and T cell receptor gene rearrangements and TAL1 deletions as PCR targets: report of the BIOMED-1 CONCERTED ACTION: investigation of minimal residual disease in acute leukemia.

M J Pongers-Willemse, T Seriu, F Stolz, E d'Aniello, P Gameiro, P Pisa, M Gonzalez, C R Bartram, E R Panzer-Grümayer, A Biondi and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed
30.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 339 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Quality Control for IG /TR Marker Identification and MRD Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

M J Pongers-WillemseDepartment of Immunology, University Hospital Rotterdam/Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
T Seriu
F Stolz
E d'Aniello
P Gameiro
P Pisa
M Gonzalez
C R Bartram
E R Panzer-Grümayer
A Biondi
J F San Miguel
J J van Dongen
Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITErasmus University Rotterdam · NLHeidelberg University · DESt Anna Children's Hospital · ATIPO Porto · PTKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is now widely accepted that the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) has prognostic value in acute leukemia. However clinical MRD studies need standardized techniques. Therefore, several European laboratories have aligned their goals and performed comparative studies to achieve optimization and standardization of MRD techniques. This was achieved via the BIOMED-1 Concerted Action "Investigation of minimal residual disease in acute leukemia: International standardization and clinical evaluation." This report describes the development of PCR primers and protocols for the detection of MRD in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) using clone-specific junctional regions of immunoglobulin and T cell receptor gene rearrangements and TAL1 deletions as PCR targets. A total of 54 primers was developed (1) to amplify rearrangements of the TCRD, TCRG, and IGK (Kde) genes as well as TAL1 deletions; (2) to sequence the junctional regions and breakpoint fusion regions; and (3) to perform MRD detection in bone marrow or peripheral blood samples during follow-up of ALL patients. Protocols were established to identify PCR targets at diagnosis by performing 25 PCR reactions per patient using appropriate positive and negative controls. Standardized protocols were developed for MRD monitoring via single amplification of the PCR target followed by dot blot hybridization with the corresponding patient-specific junctional region probe. In addition, alternative approaches were designed for cases where the target sensitivity of at least 10(-4) was not obtained. The standardization described here of MRD-PCR techniques is essential for the process of translating MRD research into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Gene DeletionGenes, ImmunoglobulinProto-Oncogene ProteinsTranscription FactorsBase SequenceBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsClinical ProtocolsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA PrimersGene Rearrangement, T-LymphocyteHumansNeoplasm, ResidualPolymerase Chain ReactionPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaProto-OncogenesReproducibility of ResultsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA PrimersProto-Oncogene ProteinsTAL1 protein, humanT-Cell Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia Protein 1Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID10049045
OpenAlexW2090823859

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.