Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10036147›Full record

ArticleAnalytical biochemistry1999

Anisotropy-based sensing with reference fluorophores.

J R Lakowicz, I Gryczynski, Z Gryczynski, J D Dattelbaum

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical biochemistry, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Wavelength-ratiometric probes for saccharides based on donor-acceptor diphenylpolyenes.Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. A, Chemistry · 2001
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J R LakowiczUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, 725 West Lombard Street, Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, USA.
I Gryczynski
Z Gryczynski
J D Dattelbaum
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

WHO'S WHO IN FLUORESCENCEP41RR008119 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI BASKAKOV, ILIA V · 1993 to 2006
$7.4M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR008119NCRR NIH HHS RR-08119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe a new approach to fluorescence sensing based on measurements of steady-state anisotropies in the presence of reference fluorophores with known anisotropies. The basic concept is that the anisotropy of a mixture reflects a weighted average of the anisotropies of the emitting species. By use of reference fluorophores the starting anisotropy can be near zero, or near 0.9 for oriented films which contain the reference fluorophore. Changing intensities of the analyte result in changes in anisotropy. A wide dynamic range of anisotropies is available because of the freedom to select high or low starting values. Anisotropy-based sensing was demonstrated for pH using 6-carboxyfluorescein and for protein affinity or immunoassay using an oriented film with high anisotropy and a protein labeled with a metal-ligand complex. The latter measurements were performed with a simple light-emitting diode excitation source without an excitation polarizer. The sensitive range of the assay can be adjusted by changing the intensity of the reference fluorophore. Anisotropy-based sensing can have numerous applications in clinical and analytical chemistry.

Indexed as

AnisotropyFluorescenceHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationProtein Binding

Identifiers

PMID10036147
PMCPMC6816241
OpenAlexW1968158448

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.