Trial reportLancet (London, England)1999
Effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition compared with conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP) randomised trial.
Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 379 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
379 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 2,010 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Agreement Between Mega-Trials and Smaller Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Research Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Blood pressure-lowering treatment for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation: An individual participant data meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and renin-angiotensin system blockers: A review and pooled analysis.Archives of cardiovascular diseases · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Chinese guidelines on the management of ascites and its related complications in cirrhosis.Hepatology international · 2019Guideline
- THE IMPACT OF CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS ON GLYCEMIC CONTROL: A REVIEW.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2017Pooled it
- Beta-blockers for hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- 7th Brazilian Guideline of Arterial Hypertension: Chapter 7 - Pharmacological TreatmentArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2016Guideline
- Beta-blockers for preventing stroke recurrence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Blood pressure control and primary prevention of stroke: summary of the recent clinical trial data and meta-analyses.Current hypertension reports · 2013Pooled it
- Blood pressure lowering and major cardiovascular events in people with and without chronic kidney disease: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2013Pooled it
- Antihypertensive agents for preventing diabetic kidney disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness of antihypertensive medication for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and multiple treatments meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2012Pooled it
- The 2009 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part 2--therapy.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2009Guideline
- Re-examining the efficacy of beta-blockers for the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analysis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2006Pooled it
- Trial
- The effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on clinical outcomes in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and midrange ejection fraction: a post hoc subgroup analysis from the PEACE trial.Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease · 2018Trial
- Pharmacologic Prevention of Incident Atrial Fibrillation: Long-Term Results From the ALLHAT (Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial).Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2017Trial
319 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAngiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been used for more than a decade to treat high blood pressure, despite the lack of data from randomised intervention trials to show that such treatment affects cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP) is a randomised intervention trial to compare the effects of ACE inhibition and conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with hypertension.
methodsCAPPP was a prospective, randomised, open trial with blinded endpoint evaluation. 10,985 patients were enrolled at 536 health centres in Sweden and Finland. Patients aged 25-66 years with a measured diastolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or more on two occasions were randomly assigned captopril or conventional antihypertensive treatment (diuretics, beta-blockers). Analysis was by intention-to-treat. The primary endpoint was a composite of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and other cardiovascular deaths.
findingsOf 5492 patients assigned captopril and 5493 assigned conventional therapy, 14 and 13, respectively, were lost to follow-up. Primary endpoint events occurred in 363 patients in the captopril group (11.1 per 1000 patient-years) and 335 in the conventional-treatment group (10.2 per 1000 patient-years; relative risk 1.05 [95% CI 0.90-1.22], p=0-52). Cardiovascular mortality was lower with captopril than with conventional treatment (76 vs 95 events; relative risk 0.77 [0.57-1-04], p=0.092), the rate of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction was similar (162 vs 161), but fatal and non-fatal stroke was more common with captopril (189 vs 148; 1.25 [1-01-1-55]. p=0.044).
interpretationCaptopril and conventional treatment did not differ in efficacy in preventing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The difference in stroke risk is probably due to the lower levels of blood pressure obtained initially in previously treated patients randomised to conventional therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.