Patients with learning disability in the community.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Organising healthcare services for persons with an intellectual disability.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
   Pooled it
2. A longitudinal cohort study of the relationship between Thimerosal-containing hepatitis B vaccination and specific delays in development in the United States: Assessment of attributable risk and lifetime care costs.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2016
   Article
3. Why are organisations that provide healthcare services fuzzy?The Australasian medical journal · 2013
   Article
4. Patience is always a virtue.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
   Article
5. Care of patients with intellectual or learning disability in primary care: no more funding so will there be any change?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006
   Article
6. 'Valuing people'--a new strategy for learning disability for the 21st century: how may it impinge on primary care?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2001
   Article
7. The primary care stroke gap.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2001
   Article
8. Who should care for people with learning disabilities? GPs need extra time to provide better services for these patients.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001
   Article
9. Mental health services for people with learning disabilities. A complete overhaul is needed with strong links to mainstream services.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000
   Article
10. More training is needed in health care of people with learning disabilities.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000
    Article
11. Needs of patients with learning disabilities are not being met.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999
    Article
12. Medicine and the marginalised. They deserve the best, not the poorest, care.BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
    Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Indwelling needles carry greater risks than acupuncture techniques.1999
• Commented on by
  Cervical screening for women with learning disability. Numbers screened can be optimised by using a focused initiative.1999

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as